Chapter 7 | Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding

Acquisti A. 2009. Nudging privacy: The behavioral economics of personal information. IEEE Security and Privacy 7(6):82–5.

Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G. 2015. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–14.

Acquisti A, Grossklags J. 2003. Losses, gains, and hyperbolic discounting: An experimental approach to information security attitudes and behavior. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Workshop on the Economics of Information Security, College Park, MD.

Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I. 2008. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science 17(1):35–54.

Association of Science and Technology Centers (ASTC). 2017. Find a science center. http://www.astc.org/about-astc/about-science-centers/find-a-science-center/. Accessed 2 May 2017.

Baek YM. 2014. Solving the privacy paradox: A counter-argument experimental approach. Computers in Human Behavior 38:33–42.

Bann CM, Schwerin MJ. 2004. Public knowledge and attitudes scale construction: Development of short forms. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.

Bauer M, Allum N, Miller S. 2007. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science 16(1):79–95.

Bauer M, Shukla R, Allum N, editors. 2012. The Culture of Science: How the Public Relates to Science Across the Globe. New York, NY: Routledge.

Bell P, Lewenstein BV, Shouse AW, Feder M, editors. 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Besley JC. 2015. Predictors of perceptions of scientists: Comparing 2001 and 2012. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 35(1–2):3–15.

Besley JC. Forthcoming. The National Science Foundation’s science and technology survey and support for science funding, 2006–2014. Public Understanding of Science (published online May 2016).

Chellappa RK, Sin RG. 2005. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Information Technology and Management 6(2–3):181–202.

China Research Institute for Science Popularization (CRISP). 2010. Chinese public understanding of science and attitudes towards science and technology. Beijing, China.

China Research Institute for Science Popularization (CRISP). 2016. Chinese public understanding of science and attitudes towards science and technology. Beijing, China.

Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT). 2016. Encuesta nacional que mide la percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología en Chile. http://www.conicyt.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Encuesta.png. Accessed 18 May 2017.

Council of Canadian Academies (CCA). 2014. Science culture: Where Canada stands. Ottawa, Canada: Expert Panel on the State of Canada’s Science Culture, Council of Canadian Academies. http://www.scienceadvice.ca/uploads/eng/assessments%20and%20publications%20and%20news%20releases/
science-culture/scienceculture_fullreporten.pdf. Accessed 17 January 2016.

Dunlap RE. 2014. Global warming or climate change: Is there a difference? Gallup: Politics. http://www.gallup.com/poll/168617/global-warming-climate-change-difference.aspx. Accessed 1 June 2017.

Einsiedel EF, Goldenberg L. 2006. Dwarfing the social? Nanotechnology lessons from the biotechnology front. In Hunt G, Mehta M, editors, Nanotechnology: Risk, Ethics, and Law, pp. 213–21. London, United Kingdom: Earthscan.

European Commission. 2005. Special Eurobarometer 224: Europeans, science and technology. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_224_report_en.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2017.

European Commission. 2008. Special Eurobarometer 300: Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_300_full_en.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2017.

European Commission. 2010a. Special Eurobarometer 340: Science and technology. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_340_en.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2017.

European Commission. 2010b. Special Eurobarometer 341: Biotechnology. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_en.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2017.

European Commission. 2013. Special Eurobarometer 401: Responsible research and innovation (RRI), science and technology. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_401_en.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2017.

European Commission. 2014a. Special Eurobarometer 409: Climate change. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_409_en.pdf. Accessed 14 September 2017.

European Commission. 2014b. Special Eurobarometer 416: Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_416_en.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2017.

European Commission. 2015. Special Eurobarometer 435: Climate change. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/69083. Accessed 21 February 2017.

Finnish Society for Scientific Information (FSSI). 2016. Summary of the Finnish Science Barometer 2016. http://www.sci.fi/~yhdys/tb6/Sciencebarometer_2016_web.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2017.

Fiske ST, Dupree C. 2014. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(Suppl. 4):13593–97.

Fleming JH, Kampf E. 2016. Few consumers trust companies to keep online info safe. Gallup: Economy. http://www.gallup.com/poll/171029/few-consumers-trust-companies-keep-online-info-safe.aspx. Accessed 21 February 2017.

Frewer LJ, van der Lans IA, Fischer ARH, Reinders MJ, Menozzi D, Zhang X, van den Berg I, Zimmermann KL. 2013. Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology 30(2):142–52.

Funk C, Goo S. 2015. A look at what the public knows and does not know about science. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/09/10/what-the-public-knows-and-does-not-know-about-science/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Funk C, Kennedy B. 2016a. The politics of climate. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/04/the-politics-of-climate/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Funk C, Kennedy B. 2016b. The new food fights: U.S. public divides over food science. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/01/the-new-food-fights/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Funk C, Kennedy B, Hefferon M. 2017. Vast majority of Americans say benefits of childhood vaccines outweigh risk. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/02/02/
vast-majority-of-americans-say-benefits-of-childhood-vaccines-outweigh-risks/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Funk C, Rainie L, Page D. 2015. Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_ScienceandSociety_Report_012915.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Gallup. 2017a. In depth: Topics A to Z—Energy. http://www.gallup.com/poll/2167/energy.aspx. Accessed 14 February 2017.

Gallup. 2017b. In depth: Topics A to Z—Environment. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/environment.aspx#. Accessed 14 February 2017.

Gauchat G. 2012. Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review 77(2):167–87.

Gokhberg L, Shuvalova O, 2004. Russian public opinion of the knowledge economy: Science, innovation, information technology and education as drivers of economic growth and quality of life. Moscow, Russia: British Council, Russia.

Jasanoff S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jones J, Saad L. 2016. Gallup poll social series: Values and beliefs. http://www.gallup.com/file/poll/192407/Moral_Issues_II_160608.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2017.

Kahan DM. 2016. ‘Ordinary science intelligence’: A science-comprehension measure for study of risk and science communication, with notes on evolution and climate change. Journal of Risk Research 20(8):995–1016.

Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D. 2011. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14(2):147–74.

Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G. 2012. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change 2(10):732–5.

Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (KOFAC). 2013. Survey of Public Attitudes towards and Understanding of Science and Technology 2012. Seoul, South Korea: KOFAC.

Kruglanski AW, Thompson EP. 1999. Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry 10(2):83–109.

Ladwig P, Dalrymple KE, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Corley EA. 2012. Perceived familiarity or factual knowledge? Comparing operationalizations of scientific understanding. Science and Public Policy 39(6):761–74.

Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Rosenthal S, Cutler M. 2017. Climate change in the American mind: November 2016. Yale University, George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/
Climate-Change-American-Mind-November-2016.pdf. Accessed 24 February 2017.

Li H, Sarathy R, Xu H. 2011. The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors. Decision Support Systems 51(3):434–45.

Losh SC. 2010. Diverse digital divides in American society: 1983–2006. In Ferro E, Dwivedi YK, Gil-Garcia JR, Williams MD, editors, Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society, A Handbook of Research, pp. 196–222. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Losh SC. 2012. Stereotypes about scientists over time among U.S. adults: 1983 and 2001. Public Understanding of Science 19(3):372–82.

Lyons L. 2005. Paranormal beliefs come (super)naturally to some. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/19558/
Paranormal-Beliefs-Come-SuperNaturally-Some.aspx?utm_source=astrology&utm_medium=search&utm_campaign=tiles. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Madden M. 2014. Most would like to do more to protect their personal information online. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/12/
most-would-like-to-do-more-to-protect-their-personal-information-online/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Madden M, Rainie L. 2015. Americans’ attitudes about privacy, security, and surveillance. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/05/20/americans-attitudes-about-privacy-security-and-surveillance/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Madden M, Smith A. 2010. Reputation management and social media. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/05/26/reputation-management-and-social-media/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Maitland A, Tourangeau R, Yan Y. 2014. NCSES Task Order 1: Experimentation with factual knowledge survey items. Final Report. Rockville, MD: Westat.

Maitland A, Tourangeau R, Yan Y, Bell R, Muhlberger P. 2014. The effect of question wording on measurement of knowledge about evolution. An examination of survey experiment data collected for the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.

Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre (MASTIC), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. 2010. The public awareness of science and technology Malaysia 2008. Putrajaya, Malaysia: MASTIC.

McComas KA, Besley JC, Steinhardt J. 2014. Factors influencing U.S. consumer support for genetic modification to prevent crop disease. Appetite 78:8–14.

McCright AM, Dentzman K, Charters M, Dietz T. 2013. The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters 8(4):044029.

Miller JD. 1998. The measurement of scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science 7(1):203–23.

Miller JD. 2004. Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science 13(3):279–94.

Miller JD, Pardo R, Niwa F. 1997. Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Bilbao, Spain: Fundación BBVA.

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva (MCTIP). 2015. Cuarta Encuesta Nacional de Percepción Pública de la Ciencia. http://www.mincyt.gob.ar/estudios/
cuarta-encuesta-nacional-de-percepcion-publica-de-la-ciencia-11656. Accessed 18 May 2017.

Mitchell A, Gottfried J, Barthel M, Shearer E. 2016. The modern news consumer: News attitudes and practices in the digital era. Pew Research Center. http://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer/. Accessed 23 January 2017.

Mondak JJ. 2004. Knowledge variables in cross-national social inquiry. Social Science Quarterly 85(3):539–58.

Muñoz A, Moreno C, Luján JL. 2012. Who is willing to pay for science? On the relationship between public perception of science and the attitude to public funding of science. Public Understanding of Science 21(2):242–53.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2016a. Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2016b. Genetically engineered crops: Experiences and prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2016c. Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Academy of Sciences, Royal Society. 2014. Climate change: Evidence and causes. http://nas-sites.org/americasclimatechoices/events/
a-discussion-on-climate-change-evidence-and-causes/. Accessed 27 March 2017.

National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP). 2012. Research on changes in public awareness of science and technology: The results of interviews and monthly Internet surveys. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Education.

National Research Council (NRC). 1996. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2008. Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Science Board (NSB). 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Two volumes (vol. 1, NSB 06-01; vol. 2, NSB 06-01A). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/.

National Science Board (NSB). 2008. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Two volumes (vol. 1, NSB 08-01; vol. 2, NSB 08-01A). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/.

National Science Board (NSB). 2010. Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. NSB 10-01. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/.

National Science Board (NSB). 2012. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. NSB 12-01. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12.

National Science Board (NSB). 2014. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. NSB 14-01. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14.

National Science Board (NSB). 2016. Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. NSB 14-01. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind16.

Newport F. 2017. U.S. energy concerns continue to diminish; near record lows. Gallup: Social Issues. http://www.gallup.com/poll/205754/energy-concerns-continue-diminish-near-record-low.aspx. Accessed 23 March 2017.

Norberg PA, Horne DR, Horne DA. 2007. The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41(1):100–26.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003. The PISA 2003 assessment framework—Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris, France: OECD.

Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2009. Many Americans mix multiple faiths. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewforum.org/files/2009/12/multiplefaiths.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Pew Research Center. 2013. Public’s knowledge of science and technology. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/22/publics-knowledge-of-science-and-technology/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Pew Research Center. 2014. As U.S. energy production grows, public policy views show little change: Majority prioritizes developing alternative energy sources. http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/12/12-18-14-Energy-release.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Pew Research Center. 2015a. Catholics divided over global warming. Pew Research Center: Religion & Public Life. http://www.pewforum.org/2015/06/16/catholics-divided-over-global-warming/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Pew Research Center. 2015b. Topline: Sharing personal information with companies. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/12/29/americans-conflicted-sharing-personal-information-topline/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Plutzer E. 2013. The racial gap in confidence in science: Explanations and implications. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 33(5–6):146–57.

Pötzsch S. 2009. Privacy awareness: A means to solve the privacy paradox? In Matyáš V, Fischer-Hübner S, Cvrček D, Švenda P, editors, The Future of Identity in the Information Society: 4th IFIP WG 9.2, 9.6/11.6, 11.7/FIDIS International Summer School, Brno, Czech Republic, September 1–7, 2008, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 226–36. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN). 2015. Consumer Products Inventory: An inventory of nanotechnology-based consumer products introduced on the market. http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Rainie L, Anderson J. 2014. The future of privacy. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/12/18/future-of-privacy/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Rainie L, Duggan M. 2016. Privacy and information sharing. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/01/14/privacy-and-information-sharing/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Rainie L, Kiesler S, Kang R, Madden M. 2013. Anonymity, privacy, and security online. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/09/05/anonymity-privacy-and-security-online/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Rainie L, Madden M. 2015. Americans’ privacy concerns post-Snowden. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/03/16/americans-privacy-strategies-post-snowden/. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Riffkin R. 2016. For first time, majority in U.S. oppose nuclear energy. http://www.gallup.com/poll/190064/first-time-majority-oppose-nuclear-energy.aspx. Accessed 3 September 2017.

Rimal RN, Flora JA, Schooler C. 1999. Achieving improvements in overall health orientation: Effects of campaign exposure, information seeking, and health media use. Communication Research 26(3):322–48.

Roos JM. 2014. Measuring science or religion? A measurement analysis of the National Science Foundation sponsored science literacy scale 2006–2010. Public Understanding of Science 23(7):797–813.

Roskos-Ewoldsen DR, Bichsel J, Hoffman K. 2002. The influence of accessibility of source likability on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38(2):137–43.

Saad L. 2017. Global warming concern at three-decade high in U.S. Gallup: Politics. http://www.gallup.com/poll/206030/global-warming-concern-three-decade-high.aspx. Accessed 22 March 2017.

Schafer MS, Metag J. 2016. Wissenschaftsbarometer Schweiz. http://www.wissenschaftsbarometer.ch/. Accessed 31 January 2017.

Schuldt JP, Konrath SH, Schwarz N. 2011. “Global warming” or “climate change”? Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1):115–24.

Shanahan J, Scheufele DA, Lee E. 2001. The polls—trends: Attitudes about agricultural biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. Public Opinion Quarterly 65(2):267–81.

Shen BSJ. 1975. Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science. In Day S, editor, Communication of Scientific Information, pp. 44–52. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.

Shukla R. 2005. India science report: Science education, human resources, and public attitude toward science and technology. New Delhi, India: National Council of Applied Economic Research.

Slater MD, Hayes AF, Ford VL. 2007. Examining the moderating and mediating roles of news exposure and attention on adolescent judgments of alcohol-related risks. Communication Research 34(4):355–81.

Smith JH, Diney T, Heng X. 2011. Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly 35:989–1015.

Spiekermann S, Grossklags J, Berendt B. 2001. E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: Privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In Wellman MP, Shoham Y, editors, EC ’01: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Tampa, Florida, USA, October 14–17, 2001, pp. 38–47. New York, NY: ACM.

Stokes B, Wike R, Carle J. 2015. Global concern about climate change, broad support for lifting emissions. Pew Research Center: Global Attitudes & Trends. http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/11/05/
global-concern-about-climate-change-broad-support-for-limiting-emissions/. Accessed 10 March 2017.

Swift A. 2016. Birth control, divorce top list of morally acceptable issues. Gallup: Social Issues. http://www.gallup.com/poll/192404/birth-control-divorce-top-list-morally-acceptable-issues.aspx. Accessed 21 February 2017.

Toumey C, Besley J, Blanchard M, Brown M, Cobb M, Ecklund EH, Glass M, Guterbock TM, Kelly AE, Lewenstein B. 2010. Science in the service of citizens & consumers: The NSF workshop on public knowledge of science, October 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. http://www.nano.sc.edu/UserFiles/nanocenter/Documents/
TOUMEY%20et%20al%202010%20SSCC%20%20NSF%20report.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Tsai J, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A. 2011. The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Information Systems Research 22(2):254–68.

University of Michigan, Muhlenberg College. 2017. National surveys on energy & environment question database. http://closup.umich.edu/national-surveys-on-energy-and-environment/nsee-data-tables/search/. Accessed 3 September 2017.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2017. Petroleum and other liquids. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/data.php. Accessed 24 March 2017.

Villar A, Krosnick JA. 2010. “Global warming” vs. “climate change”: Does word choice matter? Climatic Change 105(1–2):1–12.

Wellcome Trust. 2016. Wellcome Trust Monitor: Wave 3. London: Author. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/monitor-wave3-full-wellcome-apr16.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2017.

Wilson D, Valacich JS. 2012. Unpacking the privacy paradox: Irrational decision-making within the privacy calculus. ICIS 2012 Proceedings: Thirty-Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/ResearchInProgress/101/. Accessed 3 September 2017.

Wissenschaft im dialog. 2016. Wissenschaftbarometer: Eine representative Bevolkerungsumfrage zu Wissenschaft und Forschung. https://www.wissenschaft-im-dialog.de/projekte/wissenschaftsbarometer/. Accessed 9 May 2017.