3M. 2020. 3M State of Science Index Survey: 2020 Survey Summary. Available at https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/3m-forward-us/2020-summary/. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I. 2008. Science Knowledge and Attitudes across Cultures: A Meta-Analysis. Public Understanding of Science 17(1):35–54.

Bauer MW. 2005. Distinguishing Red and Green Biotechnology: Cultivation Effects of the Elite Press. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1):63–89.

Bauer MW. 2009. The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science—Discourse and Comparative Evidence. Science, Technology & Society 14(2):221–40.

Beets B, Newman TP, Howell EL, Bao L, Yang S. 2023. Surveying Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care in the United States: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 25:e40337.

Besley JC. 2018. The National Science Foundation’s Science and Technology Survey and Support for Science Funding, 2006–2014. Public Understanding of Science 27(1):94–109.

Bonney R. 2021. Expanding the Impact of Citizen Science. BioScience 71(5):448–51.

Breslow J. 2022. The Water Crisis in Jackson Follows Years of Failure to Fix an Aging System. National Public Radio August 31. Available at https://www.npr.org/2022/08/31/1120166328/jackson-mississippi-water-crisis. Accessed 10 August 2023.

Brossard D, Lewenstein B. 2010. A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science. In Kahlor LA, Stout P, editors, Understanding and Communicating Science: New Agendas in Communication, pp. 11–39. New York: Routledge.

Brossard D, Lewenstein B, Bonney R. 2005. Scientific Knowledge and Attitude Change: The Impact of a Citizen Science Project. International Journal of Science Education 27(9):1099–1121.

Bruine de Bruin W, Rabinovich L, Weber K, Babboni M, Dean M, Lance I. 2021. Public understanding of climate change terminology. Climatic Change 167(37):1–21.

Chaudhary U, Birbaumer N, Ramos-Murguialday A. 2016. Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Rehabilitation. Nature Reviews Neurology 12(9):513–25.

Cooper CB, Hawn CL, Larson LR, Parrish JK, Bowser G, Cavalier D, Dunn RR, Haklay M, Gupta KK, Jelks NO, Johnson VA, Katti M, Leggett Z, Wilson OR, Wilson S. 2021. Inclusion in Citizen Science: The Conundrum of Rebranding. Science 372(6549):1386–88.

Druckman JN. 2015. Communicating Policy-Relevant Science. PS: Political Science & Politics 48(S1):58–69.

Farahany N. 2023. The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Fast E, Horvitz E. 2017. Long-Term Trends in the Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 31(1):963–69.

Fearnow B. 2021. One-Third of Unvaccinated Americans Don’t Trust Scientists Who Made Vaccines, Survey Finds. Newsweek March 14. Available at https://www.newsweek.com/one-third-unvaccinated-americans-dont-trust-scientists-who-made-vaccines-survey-finds-1576031. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Federal Community of Practice for Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science (FedCCS). 2019. Available at https://www.citizenscience.gov/assets/FedCCS.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Funk C. 2021. Key Findings: How Americans’ Attitudes about Climate Change Differ by Generation, Party and Other Factors. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/26/key-findings-how-americans-attitudes-about-climate-change-differ-by-generation-party-and-other-factors/. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Funk C, Gottfried J, Mitchell A. 2017. Science News and Information Today. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2017/09/20/science-news-and-information-today/. Accessed 19 October 2023.

Funk C, Kennedy B, Johnson C. 2020. Trust in Medical Scientists Has Grown in U.S., but Mainly among Democrats. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/05/21/trust-in-medical-scientists-has-grown-in-u-s-but-mainly-among-democrats/. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Funk C, Parker K. 2018. Most Americans Evaluate STEM Education as Middling Compared with Other Developed Nations. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/5-most-americans-evaluate-stem-education-as-middling-compared-with-other-developed-nations/. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Funk C, Tyson A, Kennedy B. 2023. How Americans View Emerging Uses of Artificial Intelligence, Including Programs to Generate Text or Art. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/02/22/how-americans-view-emerging-uses-of-artificial-intelligence-including-programs-to-generate-text-or-art/. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Gallup. 2019. Wellcome Global Monitor—First Wave Findings. Available at https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018. Accessed 31 May 2023.

Gallup. 2021. Wellcome Global Monitor: Methodology and Data Analysis. Available at https://cms.wellcome.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/wgm2020-methodology.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2023.

Gibson JM, Stillo F, Wood E, Lockhart S, Bruine de Bruin W. 2022. Private Well Testing in Peri‐Urban African‐American Communities Lacking Access to Regulated Municipal Drinking Water: A Mental Models Approach to Risk Communication. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 42(4):799–817.

Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2020. Drinking Water: EPA Could Use Available Data to Better Identify Neighborhoods at Risk of Lead Exposure. GAO-21-78. Washington, DC. Available at https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-78.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2023.

Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2021. Man-Made Chemicals and Potential Health Risks: EPA Has Completed Some Regulatory-Related Actions for PFAS. GAO-21-37. Washington, DC. Available at https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-37.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2023.

Graves JL, Kearney M, Barabino G, Malcom S. 2022. Inequality in Science and the Case for a New Agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(10):e2117831119.

Hendriks F, Kienhues D, Bromme R. 2020. Replication Crisis = Trust Crisis? The Effect of Successful vs. Failed Replications on Laypeople’s Trust in Researchers and Research. Public Understanding of Science 29(3):270–88.

Hmielowski JD, Feldman L, Myers TA, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E. 2014. An Attack on Science? Media Use, Trust in Scientists, and Perceptions of Global Warming. Public Understanding of Science 23(7):866–83.

Jamieson KH, Hardy BW. 2014. Leveraging Scientific Credibility about Arctic Sea Ice Trends in a Polarized Political Environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(Suppl. 4):13598–605.

Jéquier E, Constant F. 2010. Water as an Essential Nutrient: The Physiological Basis of Hydration. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 64, 115–23.

Johnson C, Tyson A. 2020. People Globally Offer Mixed Views of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence, Job Automation on Society. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/12/15/people-globally-offer-mixed-views-of-the-impact-of-artificial-intelligence-job-automation-on-society/. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Kalil A, Ryan R. 2020. Parenting Practices and Socioeconomic Gaps in Childhood Outcomes. Future of Children 30(1):29–54.

Kim JH, Seo MH, Sinclair B. 2021. Local Weather Effects: Perception of Climate Change and Public Support for Government Intervention. Social Science Quarterly 102(2):881–96.

Knight W. 2022. ChatGPT’s Most Charming Trick Is Also Its Biggest Flaw. Wired December 7. Available at https://www.wired.com/story/openai-chatgpts-most-charming-trick-hides-its-biggest-flaw/. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Krause NM, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Xenos MA, Franke K. 2019. Trends—Americans’ Trust in Science and Scientists. Public Opinion Quarterly 83(4):817–36.

Lewenstein BV. 1992. The Meaning of “Public Understanding of Science” in the United States after World War II. Public Understanding of Science 1(1):45–68.

Lupia A. 2013. Communicating Science in Politicized Environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(Suppl. 3):14048–54.

MacDuffie KE, Ransom S, Klein E. 2022. Neuroethics Inside and Out: A Comparative Survey of Neural Device Industry Representatives and the General Public on Ethical Issues and Principles in Neurotechnology. AJOB Neuroscience 13(1):44–54.

Manning C. 2020. Artificial Intelligence Definitions. Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Available at https://hai.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/2020-09/AI-Definitions-HAI.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Miller JD. 1983. Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Daedalus 112(2): 29–48.

Miller JD. 2004. Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Public Understanding of Science 13(3):273–94.

Mitchell A, Jurkowitz M, Oliphant JB, Shearer E. 2020. Americans Who Mainly Get Their News on Social Media Are Less Engaged, Less Knowledgeable. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.journalism.org/2020/07/30/americans-who-mainly-get-their-news-on-social-media-are-less-engaged-less-knowledgeable/. Accessed 10 August 2023.

Muñoz A, Moreno C, Luján JL. 2012. Who Is Willing to Pay for Science? On the Relationship between Public Perception of Science and the Attitude to Public Funding of Science. Public Understanding of Science 21(2):242–53.

National Academy of Engineering (NAE). 2008. Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at https://doi.org/10.17226/12187. Accessed 10 August 2023.

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). 1985–2001. Survey of Public Attitudes toward and Understanding of Science and Technology. Alexandria VA: National Science Foundation.

National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12190/learning-science-in-informal-environments-people-places-and-pursuits. Accessed 10 August 2023.

National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation. 2020. Science and Technology: Public Attitudes, Knowledge, and Interest. Science and Engineering Indicators 2020 (Indicators 2020). NSB-2020-7. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20207/.

National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation. 2021. Elementary and Secondary STEM Education. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022 (Indicators 2022). NSB-2022-2. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20211/.

National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation. 2022a. Higher Education in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022 (Indicators 2022). NSB-2022-3. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20223/.

National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation. 2022b. Invention, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022 (Indicators 2022). NSB-2022-4. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20224/.

National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation. 2022c. Research and Development: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022 (Indicators 2022). NSB-2022-5. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20225/.

National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation. 2022d. Science and Technology: Public Perceptions, Awareness, and Information Sources. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022 (Indicators 2022). NSB-2022-7. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20227/.

National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation. 2023a. Elementary and Secondary STEM Education. Science and Engineering Indicators 2024 (Indicators 2024). NSB-2023-31. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202331/.

National Science Board (NSB), National Science Foundation. 2023b. Higher Education in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Indicators 2024 (Indicators 2024). NSB-2023-32. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202332/.

Newman TP, Nisbet EC, Nisbet MC. 2018. Climate Change, Cultural Cognition, and Media Effects: Worldviews Drive News Selectivity, Biased Processing, and Polarized Attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 27(8):985–1002.

Pandya R, Dibner KA, editors. 2018. Learning through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Available at https://doi.org/10.17226/25183. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Park S, Onufrak SJ, Cradock AL, Patel A, Hecht C, Blanck HM. 2023. Perceptions of Water Safety and Tap Water Taste and Their Associations with Beverage Intake among U.S. Adults. American Journal of Health Promotion 37(5):625–37. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171221150093. Accessed 11 July 2023.

Pew Research Center. 2013. Public Esteem for Military Still High. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewforum.org/2013/07/11/public-esteem-for-military-still-high/. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Pew Research Center. 2016. U.S. Public Wary of Biomedical Technologies to ‘Enhance’ Human Abilities. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/07/PS_2016.07.26_Human-Enhancement-Survey_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 28 November 2023.

Piccone A. 2020. Why We Don’t Trust Science. Wyoming Public Media July 17. Available at https://www.wyomingpublicmedia.org/post/why-we-dont-trust-science. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Rainie L, Funk C, Anderson M, Tyson A. 2022. AI and Human Enhancement: Americans’ Openness Is Tempered by a Range of Concerns. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2022/03/PS_2022.03.17_AI-HE_REPORT.pdf. Accessed 28 November 2023.

Royal Society, National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 2020. Climate Change: Evidence & Causes (Update 2020). Available at https://royalsociety.org/-/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/climate-evidence-causes/climate-change-evidence-causes.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Sanders T, Kaplan A, Koch R, Schwartz N, Hancock PA. 2019. The Relationship between Trust and Use Choice in Human-Robot Interaction. Human Factors 61(4):614–26.

Sanders T, MacArthur K, Volante W, Hancock G, MacGillivray T, Shugars W, Hancock PA. 2017. Trust and Prior Experience in Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 61(1):1809–13.

Sattler S, Pietralla D. 2022. Public Attitudes towards Neurotechnology: Findings from Two Experiments Concerning Brain Stimulation Devices (BSDs) and Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs). PLOS ONE 17(11):e0275454.

Schafer MS. 2017. How Changing Media Structures Are Affecting Science News Coverage. In Jamieson KH, Scheufele D, Kahan D, editors, The Oxford Handbook on the Science of Science Communication, pp. 51–9. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sloggy MR, Suter, JF, Rad MR, Manning DT, Goemans C. 2021. Changing Climate, Changing Minds? The Effects of Natural Disasters on Public Perceptions of Climate Change. Climatic Change 168(3–4):25.

Smith TW, Davern M, Freese J, Morgan S. 2012–18. General Social Surveys. National Science Foundation and NORC at the University of Chicago. Available at https://gssdataexplorer.norc.org. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Southwell BG, Dolina S, Jimenez-Magdaleno K, Squiers LB, Kelly BJ. 2016. Zika Virus–Related News Coverage and Online Behavior, United States, Guatemala, and Brazil. Emerging Infectious Diseases 22(7):1320–1.

Southwell B, Hedberg A, Krebs C, Zevitas S, editors. 2019. Building and Maintaining Trust in Science: Paths Forward for Innovations by Nonprofits and Funding Organizations. RTI Press Publication No. CP-0010-1909. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press.

Southwell B, Torres A. 2006. Connecting Interpersonal and Mass Communication: Science News Exposure, Perceived Ability to Understand Science, and Conversation. Communication Monographs 73(3):334–50.

Soykan CU, Sauer J, Schuetz JG, LeBaron GS, Dale K, Langham GM. 2016. Population Trends for North American Winter Birds Based on Hierarchical Models. Ecosphere 7(5):e01351.

Tenhundfeld NL, de Visser EJ, Haring KS, Ries AJ, Finomore VS, Tossell CC. 2019. Calibrating Trust in Automation through Familiarity with the Autoparking Feature of a Tesla Model X. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 13(4):279–94.

Tenhundfeld NL, de Visser EJ, Ries AJ, Finomore VS, Tossell CC. 2020. Trust and Distrust of Automated Parking in a Tesla Model X. Human Factors 62(2):194–210.

Tian H, Gaines C, Launi L, Pomales A, Vazquez G, Goharian A, Goodnight B, Haney E, Reh C, Rogers R. 2022. Understanding Public Perceptions of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Infodemiology Study of Social Media. Journal of Medical Internet Research 24(3):e25614.

Tyson A, Funk C, Kennedy B. 2023. What the Data Says about Americans’ Views of Climate Change. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/09/what-the-data-says-about-americans-views-of-climate-change/. Accessed 9 August 2023.

VanMeter-Adams A, Frankenfeld CL, Bases J, Espina V, Liotta LA. 2014. Students Who Demonstrate Strong Talent and Interest in STEM Are Initially Attracted to STEM through Extracurricular Experiences. CBE—Life Sciences Education 13(4):687–97.

Vincent-Ruz P, Schunn CD. 2018. The Nature of Science Identity and Its Role as the Driver of Student Choices. International Journal of STEM Education 5(1):48. Available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Vogels E. 2023. A Majority of Americans Have Heard of ChatGPT, But Few Have Tried It Themselves. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/05/24/a-majority-of-americans-have-heard-of-chatgpt-but-few-have-tried-it-themselves/. Accessed 24 May 2023.

Wonneberger A, Meijers MHC, Schuck ART. 2020. Shifting Public Engagement: How Media Coverage of Climate Change Conferences Affects Climate Change Audience Segments. Public Understanding of Science 29(2):176–93.

World Health Organization (WHO). 2020. Naming the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and the Virus That Causes It. Available at https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it. Accessed 12 December 2023.

Xue J, Zartarian V, Tornero-Velez R, Stanek LW, Poulakos A, Walts A, Triantafillou K, Suero M, Grokhowsky N. 2022. A Generalizable Evaluated Approach, Applying Advanced Geospatial Statistical Methods, to Identify High Lead Exposure Locations at Census Tract Scale: Michigan Case Study. Environmental Health Perspectives 130(7):77004.

Zhang B, Dafoe A. 2019. Artificial Intelligence: American Attitudes and Trends. Oxford, UK: Center for the Governance of AI, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.